AXForum  
Вернуться   AXForum > Microsoft Dynamics AX > DAX Blogs
All
Забыли пароль?
Зарегистрироваться Правила Справка Пользователи Сообщения за день Поиск

 
 
Опции темы Поиск в этой теме Опции просмотра
Старый 23.12.2006, 02:16   #1  
Blog bot is offline
Blog bot
Участник
 
25,643 / 848 (80) +++++++
Регистрация: 28.10.2006
dynamicsmatters: Layers in Dynamics Ax
Источник: http://dynamicsmatters.blogspot.com/...namics-ax.html
==============

The manner in which layers were used in the old Ax was pretty clear, we had

SYS, SYP Used by the core system
GLS, GLP Used by the initial added modules which were bought in (CRM from Hands Norway, Product builder from Aston (now Tectura) HRM from Circle Capital, Shop Floor from Thy Data Center.
LOS, LOP Used by some countries to add functionality
DIS, DIP Used by most countries for localisation
BUS,BUP Used initially by partners freely then only by invitation in an early version of IBI (Industry Builder Initiative)
VAR,VAP Used by the partners to put their code in
CUS,CUP Reserved for the customer
USR,USP Reserved for the customers

Today in V4, the first 4 are all now in SYS and I am told discussions are ongoing right now as we speak as to where to put what as regards corrections.
I would say do not be greedy:
You have freed up 3 Layers
How about designating one GLS GLP as still for internal use
and freeing UP LOS LOP for IBI use
Leaving DIS DIP empty (replace it later to add another level of user layer )

Give back both BUS and VAR to the dealers freely as it was in 2.5 and V3 initially.

And in a future version give the freed layer to the customers who also need in many cases another layer for their use.

Be a great X-Mas present a clear IBI Layer and an added Dealer layer as well as an added Customer layer

Of course it will not be easy to move things around, as the whole object numbering scheme depends upon this and moving them around is not that easy. Renumbering the objects has some dreadfull consequences all sorts of places.

But hey the clean up has given the opportunity, and I always though Erik D. when he designed it was being greedy taking 4 of the layers for the systems out of the 8 available ( not counting the patch layers ). So rebalancing is now a possibility perhaps.


/Sven

Источник: http://dynamicsmatters.blogspot.com/...namics-ax.html
 

Похожие темы
Тема Автор Раздел Ответов Посл. сообщение
Dynamics AX: Managing Your Supply Chain Using Microsoft Dynamics AX 2009 - Book Review Blog bot DAX Blogs 0 31.03.2009 23:06
axStart: Microsoft Dynamics AX 2009 Hot Topics Web Seminar Series Blog bot DAX Blogs 0 06.08.2008 12:05
Inside Dynamics AX 4.0: Usage Scenarios Blog bot DAX Blogs 0 04.10.2007 05:15
Сергей Герасимов: Что нового в Microsoft Dynamics AX 4.0 Blog bot DAX Blogs 0 16.01.2007 11:00
Dynamics AX: Why Dynamics AX beats SAP Blog bot DAX Blogs 0 10.01.2007 23:15

Ваши права в разделе
Вы не можете создавать новые темы
Вы не можете отвечать в темах
Вы не можете прикреплять вложения
Вы не можете редактировать свои сообщения

BB коды Вкл.
Смайлы Вкл.
[IMG] код Вкл.
HTML код Выкл.
Быстрый переход

Рейтинг@Mail.ru
Часовой пояс GMT +3, время: 01:54.